Author
Message
IronCelt
Newbie
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 4
ID 1893 Mauser? I've got what appears to be an 1893 Belgian made Mauser in 7.65 x 53. The gun was sporterized from a carbine, I believe (the barrel is 440mm from rec to muzzle).
The only reference I can find to a '93 in that caliber is a Turkish version, but this gun doesn't have the magazine cut-off feature that Ball mentions in MMoW.
FWIW, there is no crest.
SN's match on barrel, receiver, floorplate and bolt handle.
The boxed 'N' is present on all major parts.
The receiver has a bolt guide and the bolt is flat bottomed.
Lastly, somebody opened up the chamber to .30-06.
Should have done a chamber cast before the end of the 3 day inspection!
Other pics available.
Any help identifying this? I'm afraid I may be overlooking the obvious.
Thanks,
Steve
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 12:03 am
pacrat
Respected Member
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 4565 Location: Socialist Republic of So. Cal
Welcome to Mauser Central.
More knowledgable fellas than I am here but this is what I see.
The P.V with the rampant lion over it is a Belgium nitro proof circa 1924 the mark just above it is also Belgium, it is a inspectors mark that has been in use since 1853. the oval crest containing E.L.G. and star with crown atop is also Belgium. It is a black powder proof circa 1893.
Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:03 am
IronCelt
Newbie
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 4
93, yes Thanks, Pacrat. If I understand correctly, only the 93 has a flat bottomed bolt and this one does. However, what is confusing me is the lack of documentation (?) for a 93 in 7.65 x 53.
Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:43 pm
pacrat
Respected Member
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 4565 Location: Socialist Republic of So. Cal
Ya got me there. My 93 is a 7mm.
Wish yours still had its crest. Possibly a commercial rifle from the get go?
All the proofs are Belgium. the 7.65x53 was originally called the Belgium Mauser because they were the first country to use it as a military round in their 1891's.
Just another of many Mauser Mysteries. Maybe some of the more knowledgable fellas here have an idea.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:15 am
IronCelt
Newbie
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 4
ID 1893 Mauser? No, I think it was military at birth. The straight wrist stock still has a plate where the ring was mounted, and the forend has a piece filled in that matches where one of the barrel band retainers would have fit.
I've never seen a Turk 93. They were in 7.65, but they had magazine cut-offs which I assume required some modification to the receiver.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:05 pm
z1r
Respected Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2006 Posts: 1533 Location: Lakewood, CO, USA
More pics of the action might help. though the Belgians used the 7.65x53 they did so in the 1891 not the 1893. They produced the 1893 for other countries but all in 7x57 as far as I know. Most of the countries using the 7.65x53 went straight from the 1891 to 98 derived models. Curiously, I don't see any Belgian markings on the receiver.
It's possible someone mounted an 1891 Beligian barrel onto a 93 receiver then rechambered to .30-06.
Me, I wouldn't be too keen on that conversion. This was done to a lot of 1909 Argentines and they never really had a reputation for stellar accuracy.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:44 pm
pacrat
Respected Member
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 4565 Location: Socialist Republic of So. Cal
Mike raises a definite possibility as to how this rifle came to be as it is now.
I suggest you (slug) the barrel and find out the actual bore diameter. Might give an answer or just raise more questions.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:53 pm
IronCelt
Newbie
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 4
ID 1893 Mauser? Quote: Curiously, I don't see any Belgian markings on the receiver.
Pic attached. Obelisk on the right (facing), five pointed star over an 'x' on the left and the initials 'JB' inside a rectangle in the center. In front of the recoil lug on the right is a heavily stamped 'F'.
The same obelisk, star and X are on the bolt handle root.
I guess it's possible it's been rebarreled, but the SN's on the barrel and receiver match in style and the index marks on the face of the receiver and barrel match perfectly. These indicate to me an original barrel.
I think it's just one of the many undocumented guns and doubt I'll be able to do better than that.
Concur on the conversion. I'll rebarrel it in 6.5 x 55 or 7 x 57 before I shoot it as a .30-06.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:28 pm
pacrat
Respected Member
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 4565 Location: Socialist Republic of So. Cal
Re. last pics,
Mark behind recoil lug on right appears to be same as one on barrel, which is Belgium. I got nothing on the JB. Look closer at the (X) on the left, could it be (crossed rifles)? If so it is a 1923 Spanish proof.
Since the reciever was scrubbed it is suspicious (at least to me) that the Sr. #'s are placed as these are. Usually they were on ring and barrel just above stock line. Belgium proofs on barrel are also offset and not on C/L under barrel. Lack of thumb cut in left rail usually means an early 93 as later on they thumb cut and vented the left side of front ring.
The Spanish did make and sell commercial short rifles that were pretty much the same as their military rifles. Straight wrist stocks, sling swivels, etc. As to whether any of these were made by the Belgiums for the Spanish I know not.
It's a head-scratcher for sure.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:54 pm
Display posts from previous: All Posts 1 Day 7 Days 2 Weeks 1 Month 3 Months 6 Months 1 Year Sort by: Post Time Post Subject Author Ascending Descending